Every time a computer performs a task, an invisible conversation unfolds inside it. Numbers move between memory and processor, circuits signal one another, and layers of software exchange instructions. These interactions feel instantaneous and effortless, yet behind the scenes, they carry a real energetic price. For decades, scientists believed that communication inside a machine could, at least in principle, be made thermodynamically free of cost. A new study overturns that assumption and shows that whenever information moves from one place to another, some heat must be released. Communication, it turns out, is never cheap.[1]
This insight comes from the paper Minimal thermodynamic cost of communication by Abhishek Yadav and David Wolpert, paired with the accessible summary published by TechXplore, “For computational devices, talk isn’t cheap: Research reveals unavoidable energy costs across all communication channels.” Together, they offer a unified explanation of why all communication consumes energy, how much is fundamentally required, and what this means for the future of computing.
The starting point is simple. Every digital task, whether streaming a movie or running a spreadsheet, depends on components exchanging information. Modern machines spend a surprising fraction of their total energy budget not on computation itself but on shuttling data between parts. Yet the field has lacked a clear understanding of the minimum energy required for this communication. Yadav and Wolpert set out to define those thermodynamic bounds and discovered that the cost is both unavoidable and universal.
Their work builds on two significant bodies of knowledge. The first is communication theory, founded by Claude Shannon, which quantifies the amount of information that can be transmitted through a noisy channel. The second is stochastic thermodynamics, which studies how real physical systems behave when they are out of equilibrium, a category that includes everything from smartphones to neurons. By combining these fields, the researchers created a general framework that applies to any communication channel, whether it is an optical fiber, a wireless link, or a biological signaling pathway.
At the heart of their result is the simple but powerful idea that real communication channels always contain noise. Some fraction of the transmitted information is always lost or distorted. The portion that survives is called mutual information, and it represents the useful content that makes it through. Yadav and Wolpert show that the minimum heat a system must dissipate to transmit information is at least equal to this mutual information. In other words, the more meaningful information you want to send, the more heat you must generate.
These findings overturn earlier claims that communication could be made thermodynamically reversible. Those claims focused only on the reversible part of heat flow and ignored entropy production, the irreversible component that cannot be recovered. The new work shows that entropy production is inseparable from communication. Whenever a system copies, transmits, or updates information, it produces heat. This is not a hardware limitation but a fundamental physical law.
The researchers did not stop at the communication channel itself. Modern systems rely heavily on encoding and decoding to protect messages from noise. These steps introduce redundancy to detect and correct errors. Using a model of computation called a periodic machine, Yadav and Wolpert analyzed the thermodynamic cost of these algorithms. They found that both encoding and decoding incur unavoidable energy costs, and that improving accuracy requires more energy. Better error correction means more heat.
This insight has profound implications. It means that the energy cost of communication is not just a property of the channel but of the entire communication pipeline. It also means that designers face a tradeoff between reliability and efficiency. If you want fewer errors, you must accept a higher thermodynamic cost.
The study’s results apply far beyond digital electronics. Because the framework is based on abstract principles rather than specific hardware, it applies to any system that transmits information. Biological neurons, for example, communicate through electrochemical signals that are inherently noisy. The brain spends about 20% of the body’s energy budget, yet it remains far more efficient than artificial computers. Understanding the thermodynamic limits of communication may help explain how biological systems achieve this efficiency and how engineered systems might emulate them.
The findings also highlight limitations in the von Neumann architecture that dominates modern computing. In this design, the memory and the processor are physically separated, with constant communication between them. This separation creates a significant energy bottleneck. As the TechXplore article notes, the principles uncovered in this research could inspire new architectures that reduce communication overhead and improve energy efficiency.
Looking ahead, the work opens several promising directions. One is the design of communication protocols and computer architectures that minimize entropy production. Another is the study of correlated information sources, since the current analysis focuses on independent messages. A third is the exploration of biological communication systems, which may already operate near thermodynamic limits.
The real-world impact could be significant. As computing continues to scale, energy efficiency becomes a central concern across data centers and mobile devices. Understanding the unavoidable thermodynamic costs of communication provides a foundation for designing systems that use energy more wisely. It also offers a new lens for analyzing complex systems where communication is essential, including neural networks, sensor networks, and distributed computing.
The path forward involves translating these theoretical bounds into practical design principles. Engineers will need to rethink how data moves inside machines, how algorithms handle noise, and how architectures balance reliability with energy cost. Researchers will need to explore how these thermodynamic limits interact with emerging technologies such as neuromorphic computing, quantum communication, and biologically inspired systems.
The message of the research is that communication is not free, and it never will be. But by understanding the thermodynamic cost of information, we can design systems that use energy wisely, communicate more efficiently, and perhaps even learn from the remarkable efficiency of the natural world.
This article is shared at no charge for educational and informational purposes only.
Red Sky Alliance is a Cyber Threat Analysis and Intelligence Service organization. We provide indicators-of-compromise information via a notification service (RedXray) or an analysis service (CTAC). For questions, comments, or assistance, please get in touch with the office directly at 1-844-492-7225 or feedback@redskyalliance.com
- Reporting: https://www.redskyalliance.org/
- Website: https://www.redskyalliance.com/
- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/64265941
Weekly Cyber Intelligence Briefings:
REDSHORTS - Weekly Cyber Intelligence Briefings
https://register.gotowebinar.com/register/5207428251321676122
Comments